pastersight.blogg.se

• #Example faa grant oversight process update

For example, the State of Minnesota provides 5% of the project costs for most federal projects, leaving just 5% of the total costs up to the airport sponsor. Some states also participate in the local share of projects. Projects eligible and justified for federal funding will most commonly be funded at 90% with federal grant dollars and 10% with local dollars. Cost is the most important element of a CIP.

For example, is the project going to occur on the runway, taxiway, apron or access road? Is your project a planning project or for equipment? For example, in Minnesota, it is helpful to add the federal fiscal year you anticipate the project to receive a grant to the project name. Some states have other considerations to include in your project description. Include an easy to understand title of your project. Make sure you're considering the federal, state and your local fiscal years and accommodating them appropriately.

#Example faa grant oversight process update

So, it’s important to review and update your CIP every year. It’s important for airport sponsors to show a need for funding into the future to continue to receive state and federal funding support for their airport projects.īut, we all know budgets and goals change. If Congress does not see a need beyond the next five years for aviation funding, they may use the money they have for other initiatives. Congress provides funding to many programs throughout the country. This helps to illustrate to your local and state governments the need for aviation funding. In order for a CIP to be most effective, you should include 20 years of projects. To make sure funds are apportioned appropriately, it’s important to be in contact with your local department of transportation and FAA representatives early and often.

Likewise, each regional CIP is assembled from information provided by individual state airport CIPs.